bins are evenly spaced frequency bands, Myth is not granular.
What are 'bin arrays' and how are MSEGS being used in the context of sounds for Myth? Are MSEGS not used (more) in sequencing contexts? In any case, in both those contexts, it would seem the sounds are being granularized. Or, perhaps the sound is being played almost per-partial, but not quite-- more like a wavetable (AKA bin array?), maybe a little like that Tomophone 'synth'?
Thanks!
Msegs can be used for far more than sequencing
When you look at the iris, the shape of the lines approximates the MSEG for that layer, you can think of it as a volume curve per layer.
Myth is not like tomophone, it is not wavetable either, nor are wavetables bin based, they are determined by harmonics
"What is an 'engine' and since when are the oscillators not part of it?'
in the context of this particular conversation, I meant that the vital AI tool used the whole of vital, much like how synplant does, to resynthesize the audio, rather than JUST using an array of oscillators. Let me clarify further, I don't mean to say oscillators aren't part of a synth engine, what I'm saying is that often times, resynthesis is done exclusively with an array of oscillators, but in the case of synplant and the other AI thing, it is using the all of the elements on the synth, like filters, envelopes etc. This isn't to say oscillators aren't part of the engine.
"Any link to Myth's manual online that I could take a read? Is Myth ultimately chopping up the inference/resynthesis into grains"
there's a manual included with the demo, Myth has a 90 day demo you can download. it is not using granular for the resynthesis.
"What's the best that gives you a good level of per-partial control with resynthesis and/or AI 'resynthesis'/'inference' do you think?"
I don't think there is a best, I think there's a lot of options that vary in quality and vary based on input material.
Statistics: Posted by databroth — Fri May 03, 2024 5:30 am