My guess is, because it becomes a hot unwieldy mess of features that you have covered with tons of plugins when you need that specific curveAll the new features are amazing, but i'm still quite sad that they didn't include more curves though, did they ever answer why they didn't do that?long quote
i don't want 50 options on a dropdown, that's not why i go for ProQ3 or why i reached for ProQ2.
I reach for ProQ3 when i need to EQ something quickly and not kill my CPU, it's an -every track- EQ, not "lets do a pultec here" EQ in my opinion
Dynamic EQ is not supposed to be a multiband compressor, if you can't tell what the difference is and how their usage differs, you probably don't need either. I wan't Pro-MB to go into a different direction than ProQ4 dynamic modes - i want to have ProC2 algos per band rolled into it, up/downward compression at the same time and things like that.overpriced company. Pro-Q is good but a lot has caught up to it, even like built in DAW EQs are basically fine like Bitwig EQ+ or StudioOne Pro EQ (though no mid-side, etc). it's not really worth it imo.
just my opinion which might be unpopular.
The "DYNAMIC EQ" features are OK in Pro-Q but it might as well just combine their Pro-MB with Pro-EQ as its basically the same thing. But they have to be two 200 dollars plugins
I don't need that in an EQ.
Also the whole bundle can be had for 400 bucks on sale, and considering how reliable these are and how often i use them, they're easily the best purchase i made as far as plugins go
Statistics: Posted by Ploki — Wed Dec 11, 2024 1:23 pm